I didn’t partially subscribe. Don’t partially deliver.

by Fadra Nally on May 17, 2011

You can probably take a guess what today’s topic is. It comes by special request: partial RSS feeds and how we feel about them.

I have to be honest. I never had an opinion one way or the other about RSS feeds. I set up my feed through Feedburner just like practically every other blogger in the world. I never gave it much thought and didn’t even check into the options that were available when I set up my feed.

I subscribed to more blogs than I could ever read and every so often, I actually checked my Google Reader and read through the posts. For some of my favorite blogs, I actually subscribed through email (however, I quickly learned that there are better ways to keep your inbox clean unless you really, really want to read a blog).

I found that I almost always read the full post in my reader. If I felt compelled to comment, I would click through on the post and leave a comment on the blog. If it was a partial post in my reader and the post was interesting enough, I would click through, finish reading, and comment if I felt compelled.

I never gave it much thought until I started caring about traffic. I investigated. If a person reads my post in their reader, how does that affect my traffic? It doesn’t and herein lies some of the problem.

Some bloggers make a conscious choice to deliver a partial feed of their blog posts. The theory is that the reader will be enticed by the “teaser” that’s delivered and click through to read the full post. The blogger gets the best of both worlds, in terms of numbers. You are counted as a subscriber AND deliver traffic to the site. Sounds good, right?

Apparently not.

If you’re not familiar with blog etiquette, this is a practice that greatly annoys many, many readers out there. In fact, Stacey Nerdin, she of Tree, Root, and Twig fame and also Mabel’s Labels and now ShePosts (yeah, she’s a busy girl), takes personal offense to the practice and isn’t afraid to talk about it:

“I think it’s universally understood that the only reason (other than ignorance, which is sometimes the case) a blogger uses a partial feed is to try to rope in traffic via click-throughs from people wanting to read the full post.

This just feels disingenuous to me. First of all, I am a loyal subscriber, and even though you may not get direct traffic from me every day, you still get to claim me as a subscriber when you submit your stats to someone. That should count for something, right? Second, if you write compelling content, I am likely to click-through on my own to either share your post through Facebook or Twitter, or to even leave a comment. You don’t need to schnooker me into coming to your site, and if you try, it makes me feel like your traffic is more important than your audience. I promptly unsubscribe from all partial RSS feeds. Which is ironic, isn’t it, because now you don’t get my traffic, my comments, my ability to share your post, or my subscription.”

As I mentioned, I can actually claim full ignorance when it comes to setting up feeds. It’s why I want to help you, as a blogger, avoid this snafu and make sure you keep all the readers you can get. I’ve got two rules to help you.

1. If you are one of these traffic mongers, STOP. Your tricks might work some of the time but in the end, you’ll end up annoying more than you actually retain.

2. If you are simply ignorant like me, let’s fix this problem.

  • Log in to Feedburner (assuming that’s what you use).
  • Select your feed.
  • Select the Optimize tab.
  • Click on Summary Burner.
  • If you see the Activate button, you’re good. If you have the ability to Deactivate, shame on you. Go ahead and deactivate.

If you’re still not convinced that this is the right way to handle your feed, let Feedburner’s own words convince you. In the Summary Burner section, they specifically tell you what the service is for:

“Sometimes you just want to be a tease. Offer a short summary of your hyperlink-free content and direct your subscribers to your Web site for the rest of the story. You can also append an optional “Teaser” message to each content item.”

I ask you, do you really want to be a tease?

  • http://thinspiralnotebook.wordpress.com/ Tara R.

    I’m not bothered by partial feeds, but I do offered full content for my posts. One other reason to only give partial feeds, and a reason I’ve considered myself, is that aggregate sites can’t scrap your content if you only have a partial RSS feed. I loath plagiarism, but don’t know any other way to prevent my content from being used without my permission, even if a trackback to my original post is used.

    • Anonymous

      Great point, Tara. And now you’ve inspired me to take on another topic. I think plagiarism is something that we need to understand and find better ways to address in the blogging industry. I may be coming back to you… 

      • http://thinspiralnotebook.wordpress.com/ Tara R.

        Please do. I have been plagiarized twice… by the same blogger. I have some strong opinions on the subject.

  • http://treerootandtwig.com Stacey @ Tree, Root, and Twig

     I bully because I love, really. :D Also, the post of this title is just perfect! Very clever! I had never read Feedburner’s description of partial feeds, and I think it’s hilarious.

    • Anonymous

      You’ll find people like me who don’t really care how the feed is. I don’t mind clicking through. But some people do. They really REALLY do. If it can make it easier for people to read my blog, I’m all for it. Thanks for the inspiration and education! 

  • http://remarkablogger.com Michael Martine

    This is one of those things “everybody” says they hate but for which any amount of testing will reveal the truth. If you can’t get people to click through to read the content then you suck. If you can’t overcome people’s inherent inertia then you’re just not good enough a writer.

    People WILL click through if you’re good. And they freely admit it, while at the same time proclaiming their hate for partial feeds.

    Don’t listen to what people say. Listen to what they do. And don’t write limp headlines.

    • http://www.prettyalltrue.com Kris

      I would just like to go on record here as LOVING Mr. Martine.

      As far as I am concerned, f you will not click through from my partial feed to read my post?

      I care as much about losing you as you care about not reading my words.

      As in . . . Not at all.

      • Anonymous

        I think it’s better reading the post directly on the site anyway. I usually skim things in my reader and then click through. It’s just easier for me. But if “the people” want a full feed, it doesn’t affect me at all to make the change so I’ll do it.

      • http://remarkablogger.com Michael Martine

        Hey look if the only reason why people click through is because they’re lazy
        and they wouldn’t if you had partial feeds then that means your writing
        isn’t good enough, end of story. You know this is true because people say
        things like, “Well normally I hate partial feeds but in this case…” Having
        full feeds only gives you the illusion you’re doing okay because there’s no
        real test of your writing’s effectiveness.

        The headline of this post is a lie because what you signed up for is what I
        give you. If that’s not what you want then don’t sign up. Or unsubscribe.

        Feel free to continue to ignore my point: the writing (especially the
        headlines) has to be compelling enough to get the click. If you can’t do
        that, you’re mediocre at best. And guess what? The net is choked with that
        already. Take a number.

        If you’re a “problogger” and you monetize through advertising, then you need
        to bring the reader back to blog to score ad impressions. If you can’t do
        that then what the hell are blogging for? Take the ads off.

        If you’re running a business and looking for leads, you need to bring
        traffic back to the blog for conversion. Again, if you can’t manage that,
        then your business will sink.

        I don’t want huge quantities of people reading my stuff. I want the RIGHT
        people reading my stuff. People who want what I have for them badly enough
        to suffer through the gargantuan, nay, herculean effort required to click on
        one simple link.

        What people really want is content so awesome they have to have it no matter
        what. What YOU want are QUALIFIED visitors. If you can’t be bothered, I
        don’t want you wasting my bandwidth. I want people who care, because those
        are the people you form relationships with, which is where all the real
        magic happens. :)

        • Anonymous

          Michael – I absolutely agree with your point that good blogging begins with good writing. And while some bloggers are all about the numbers, most care about authentic engagement and good ol’ fashioned conversation.

          My primary point is that there is an expectation that when someone subscribes to your blog, it is for their reading convenience. If that is something that doesn’t matter to you as a blogger to provide to your readers, then we simply have a difference in opinion, not in idealogy.

          • http://remarkablogger.com Michael Martine

            I can live with that. :) Certainly it’s a discussion worth having, and glad
            you brought it up.

    • Anonymous

      At first, I thought you were giving me a directive with that last statement ;)

      Personally, this is not an issue for me. I hate reading in a reader anyway. I like to be surrounded by design and photos and even annoying ads on a blog. Call it context, call it ambience. Most of my reading comes from really interesting sounding links on Twitter. Yes, catch me there and I’ll click on anything.

      As for partial feeds, it’s no skin off my back to change it for the people it truly annoys. As I mentioned in another comment, I’ve never had anyone complain to me because I’m delivering FULL feeds.

  • http://socialposer.com/ Collin

     Posts like this are why invited you to be in the tribe, Fadra! The best part is that you’ve not only complained about a problem, but you’ve offered a solution and instructions.

    • Anonymous

      It’s actually not even my complaint. But if the masses don’t like something, why not cater to them? This is not a battle where I need to stand my ground.

  • http://www.sunshinewonderland.com MrsWonder

    Thank you for the instructions! When I moved to WordPress, I barely set up the Feedburner. Bonus points for me- it wasn’t active already. YAY!
     

    • Anonymous

      I think they’ve changed the default. I’m quite sure I never *chose* partial feed yet I had a fellow blogger beg me to change it. I never realized so I’m still pleading ignorance here.

  • http://www.mommywords.com Brittany at Mommy Words

    I am not a fan of partial feeds for the same reason as Stacey.  I feel like I have already subscribed and would like to read the post in my reader and click through if I want to share or comment on the post.  

    • Anonymous

      I’m totally different. I actually hate to read in my reader so I don’t mind clicking through at all. The posts just feels different when I’m reading it in the context of their site and their design. Bottom line, though, I just need to get better about reading!

  • http://mommysnest.blogspot.com MommyLisa

     I am good – I am also CLUELESS to setting up FeedBurner.  I got a lesson on email delivery about six months ago.  I had not set that up before.  :(

    • Anonymous

      Sometimes it pays to go in there and poke around. They are actually created more features to make it easier to track and analyze and most importantly NOT annoy anyone out there.

  • http://thetwinspin.blogspot.com Leigh Ann

     Stacy’s opinion is exactly how I feel. At first I thought “Oh! I need to set up a partial feed so I can get the traffic!” But then I realized that as a reader myself (who’s usually reading on my phone), there are a select few that I actually click through to read, either because they are must-reads, or I know they run on a mobile theme that won’t take forever to load and I won’t have to zoom in on. The rest get overlooked usually. 

    • Anonymous

      So you ARE a tease! Like I mentioned, I never really gave it much thought. However, if there are people who feel really strongly about it, why not make it easer for them? I’ve never had anyone INSIST I switch back to a partial feed!

      • http://thetwinspin.blogspot.com Leigh Ann

        No, I never set it up! I subscribe to myself, and I was able to see
        that I am a full feed girl! But I definitely thought about it, until
        someone warned me that a lot of people don’t read partial feeds, and
        as it turns out, I don’t read that many of them either.

        I think in the end I’m just glad that someone is reading my stuff,
        whether they clock over or not. The clicks are just for my ego. :)

  • http://twitter.com/momcommblog Melissa Culbertson

     Amen! I’d also add that I find it selfish for those that purposefully do this. Why? Because if I have 10 minutes to read some blogs and they are all partial feeds, I just wasted a bunch of time having to click over to each person’s site.

  • http://twitter.com/AndreaUpdyke Andrea(LilKidThings)

     Best post title ever! Totally sucked me right in. That said, I am a Google Reader loyalist. I RARELY actually go to someone’s blog unless I clicked through to comment. and I really can’t stand partial feeds. I want to get in and out. Too many extra steps and I am out. Maybe that makes me lazy, but it is what it is!

    • Anonymous

      And as someone who hasn’t dusted off her reader in MONTHS, you can see why I never gave it much thought. I provide my subscription as a service to my readers. For THEIR convenience.  Once someone brought it to my attention, the problem was solved! 

  • GoodGirlGoneGreen

    Thanks for sharing…that was very helpful information!

  • Anonymous

    I found a way around the whole partial feed thing, thanks to my incessant internet surfing.  If you enter the feed address at http://fulltextrssfeed.com/feed.php, they will give you a link to add to your reader to get the full feed.  I’ve done this with a few blogs already and it works great.

  • http://www.newmusicmichael.com/ Michael Senchuk

    Thanks for this, Fadra. I’ve been running full feeds since I started my blog, but had been hemming and hawing recently. This closed the hems and the haws, definitely will keep it at full posts now.

    • Anonymous

      As an author, I hem and haw too. But when the readers speak, I LISTEN! Good
      call, Mike.

  • Pingback: Cool Tools | altdotlife: Build your own village

  • Djachao

    NIce post Fadran,
    it’s really a problem with all the good blogs just offering partial feeds, of course there are many tools to solve the problem with a work around like http://www.feedsapi.com but still, it’ll be a better user experience to just offer the full text feed, nobody partially subscribe to feeds.

Previous post:

Next post:

Web Statistics