Why Bloggers Should Stop Promoting Each Other

by Fadra Nally on April 3, 2013

You read that right. Bloggers need to stop promoting each other. But don’t worry, as with most statements, there are some caveats.

Let’s start with the why.

Way back when, in the early days of my blogging career (circa 2009), I stumbled onto the blogging scene. I was a newbie to the extreme not really even knowing that there was a whole community surrounding the world of bloggers.

I remember receiving the first comment on my blog from someone I didn’t know. I went through the same emotions many bloggers do early on in their career:

How did they find me?

What compelled them to leave me a comment?

Should I comment on their blog?

How do I keep them coming back?

Frankly, it was all about relationship building. I might read something I like and share it with my friends. I might visit someone else’s blog who visited mine and leave a comment for them. Or I might attend a Bloggy Boot Camp and find out that there are real people behind all of these online blogs. These real people became real friends and reading their blog was like checking in on them on a regular basis.

But that’s all changed. Or at least, it seems that it has.

Not to put the blame on Triberr but I think a lot of the relationship building ending around the time that Triberr really catalyzed the idea of link sharing. Triberr was meant to be a group of like-minded content creators interested in sharing each other’s content to audiences of similar interests. Instead, it evolved (very quickly) into hundreds of bloggers in many, many groups resulting in a Twitter feed of nothing but link sharing.

Triberr certainly wasn’t the first to come up with this idea. They simply automated it.

I participate in many Facebook groups of bloggers who believe in promoting each other’s content. Whatever it is. Share it on Facebook, pin it on Pinterest, tweet it on Twitter. And the members perform the obligatory tasks knowing the same will be done for them. And it goes beyond the basics as well. There are groups just for pinning or for stumbling or for Klout or for Alexa rankings. Everyone’s trying to game the system and I can’t say that I blame them.

I have to imagine that it works for many bloggers. By the sheer volume of distribution, I would imagine that there is a increase in traffic, which perhaps makes it all worthwhile for them.

But here’s why I recommended against it.

Bloggers have lost a lot of their authenticity and credibility. Now, I don’t mean as writers. That a whole separate topic when it comes to writing with/for/about brands. I’m talking about a blogger’s opinion.

When I tweet a link on Twitter, it’s because I’ve read it, I like it, and feel it’s worth sharing with my followers. The end.

When I share a link on Facebook, it’s because I’ve read it, I like it, and feel it’s worth sharing with my friends. The end.

When I pin something on Pinterest, it’s because I think it’s cool. The end.

Call me old-fashioned but that’s how I think things should still be done. Let me give you some examples of what I consider the right way and the wrong way.

Now, I have nothing against @richiekawamoto (I don’t actually even follow him) but if you look at his timeline of tweets, you’ll see something like this:

Based on Richie’s bio, he focuses on strategic marketing and PR for brands. It makes sense that he wants to share content that is relevant to his field and his audience. But what he’s lacking is his endorsement of the content. These days, a retweet DOES NOT equal an endorsement and people will even tell you so! I want to know why Richie thinks we need to read this content. What he found interesting or compelling.

Let me show you some examples that strike my fancy:

I don’t follow Stacey but I do follow @jaymelamm who retweeted this. She tweeted a link and then added a comment and a link to her friend, making this tweet personally relevant and appealing.

Here’s another one:

Carolyn tweeted out a link from a Yahoo story and added her own commentary. And it certainly caught my eye (humor always does).

However you choose to format it, when you’re sharing content on Twitter or Facebook, add your thoughts and opinions and tell your audience why you read something, what you liked about it, and why they might like to read it too. If you are linking to support a fellow blogger, those few words will carry your share so much further.

Finally, I’m not here to say we should never share each other’s content. If you have a “tribe” of 5 to 10 bloggers and you all read each other’s blogs and really want to help each other out, by all means, do it! But take the time to share with purpose and give it a proper endorsement.

This post has been brewing in my head for quite some time but really came to light last night when a Twitter friend “shouted” out amidst all the Twitter parties and links being shared:

What do you think? Have we lost true and authentic communications? Do endorsements mean anything to you anymore or is it all about the numbers? Weigh in!

 

 

{ 155 comments }

Thinning Out the Twitter Herd

by Fadra Nally on November 13, 2012

I joined Twitter back in 2008. I wear that like a badge of honor that indicates that I, for once, was an early adopter.

The fact of the matter is that while I joined at an early date, I didn’t really get Twitter until I started using it in earnest in 2009. And then a love affair began. It clicked with me and I got it. I slowly built my following the old-fashioned way. I’d log in, jump into random conversations, and make friends.

I’ve been doing it that way for years but things on Twitter have changed. A big shift started when Triberr came along to automate what a lot of people had already started doing: link sharing.

I love the idea of an online community, or a tribe, that jives with you. You want to support each other and promote each other’s online work. I love to share things that I read because it’s struck a nerve with me in some way. And I believe that authentic endorsements are what really matter to people.

As a result of the massive link sharing, I’ve found myself logging into Twitter less and less. I’ve started spending more and more time on Facebook. Now I love both platforms but Facebook is what I consider a timesuck. It can easily take me down a rabbit hole that usually takes me at least an hour to climb back out of. I want to fall back in love with Twitter. So I decided to make some changes.

Last week, I took a look at my Twitter profile. While I’ve amassed over 8000 followers (the exact number goes up and down on a daily basis), I also followed over 4500 people.

Admittedly, that’s a lot of people to keep up with. I’ve never minded the large number because I’m not the type to log in and catch up on every single tweet. I’m a slice-of-life kind of gal and appreciate reading about what’s going in the moment with the people online in that moment.

But again, I’d review my timeline and see link after link for giveaways and posts that were really of no interest to me. So I’d pull up someone’s profile and look at their tweeting history. No personal engagement, no replies. Just links and retweets. So I unfollowed them.

For a brief moment, I felt guilty. They had chosen to follow me and I had reciprocated and now I felt like I was dumping them without even telling them. But then I felt something else. I felt relief. And I felt a little bit lighter. So I started checking a few other profiles and did the same thing.

Then I decided I needed to dig a little deeper and I enlisted the help of two of my favorite Twitter management tools.

ManageFlitter is my absolute favorite tool. It doesn’t take long to run, puts people in easy to understand buckets, and makes it super easy to unfollow someone if that’s something you choose to do.

ManageFlitter

The results are returned with followers grouped by:

  • Those not following back (which is sometimes totally okay).
  • Those with no profile image (aka “eggheads”)
  • Those considered spam accounts
  • Those who don’t speak English
  • Those with a high ratio of followers to following (I call them the Collectors)
  • Those who are inactive (usually haven’t tweeted in over 30 days)
  • Those that tweet constantly (what’s wrong with that?)
  • And those who rarely tweet

You can work through the list and get a snapshot of each person before you decide if you want to take action:

Follower details

As a result of my ManageFlitter run, I got rid of about 500 people that I consider “dead weight.” And I suddenly started feeling lighter. So I didn’t stop there.

I was reminded of another tool I used to use called TwitCleaner.

Like ManageFlitter, it’s a tool meant to help you manage the quality of the people you follow on Twitter. While similar to ManageFlitter, it uses different categories to help you find the people that might just be clogging up your feed.

TwitCleaner

While TwitCleaner has some overlaps with ManageFlitter, it drills down into the following types of groups:

  • Those that use too many @s in one tweet too often. You’ll find a lot of these on Follow Friday.
  • Those people that tweet nothing but links.
  • Those people that tweet the same link over and over
  • Those that tweet the same tweet over and over
  • Those that are responsible for a lot of app spam (like Foursquare check-ins, GetGlue check-ins)
  • Those that do advertisements and sponsored tweets
  • Those that are inactive
  • Those that don’t ever interact with their followers
  • Those that only retweet (no original intent)
  • Those that only ever talk about themselves

Again, you can pick and choose. I don’t expect celebrities to follow me back and most of them don’t interact with their users. But I had to even cut some of them loose. The novelty of following a celebrity has worn off for me.

Once you review your list, you can simply click on those you want to unfollow and, unlike ManageFlitter that unfollows all at once, TwitCleaner will slowly unfollow those you selected.

Too many links

When my cleaning was all said and done, I had dropped about 1000 people I was following.

Did I still feel a little guilty? Of course, I did. That’s just my nature. So I put a little disclaimer out there.

 

I’ve noticed that my following has gone down as well. Perhaps some of the people I unfollowed returned the favor. But I never ever keep track of who comes and goes. That’s one form of mental torture I don’t need.

{ 16 comments }

5 Reasons to Celebrate a Blogoversary

October 11, 2012

Let’s get something straight. There is no correct way to spell “blogoversary.” You’ll see it as blogoversary (my preferred spelling), blogiversary (like anniversary), or blogaversary. But let’s face it. It’s a made up word. Does that make it a made up celebration? Of course. But here are a few reasons I think you should pause every year [...]

Read the full article →

Pitch of the Week: How BuildASign.com Cheated Me – UPDATED

September 27, 2012

I should know better. I read bad pitches on a daily basis. Most I casually discard because they are so poorly written or completely irrelevant to me. But I do usually read them. I do a quick scan for the following: What product or brand is this pitch for? Who is contacting me on behalf [...]

Read the full article →

Just Say NO to Blogging Contests (and other rules about compensation for blogging)

September 11, 2012

As I celebrated my third “blogoversary” this week, or the third anniversary of my very first post on my personal blog I took a little time to go back and read some of my early posts and reflect on how much I’ve learned in those three short years. I must admit that I’m not offended [...]

Read the full article →

The Problem with Blogger Lists

August 28, 2012

Every time a top 100 Blogger List come out, I find a problem with it. And no, it’s not that I’m not on it. The problem is that they are subjective and subjectivity reigns supreme in the blogosphere. Looking at tools like Klout or PeerIndex, everyone is trying to assign a score. They are trying to [...]

Read the full article →

The Blogger-Brand Experience at BlogHer12

August 16, 2012

It’s been over a week since I returned from NYC, home of this year’s BlogHer conference. I pondered over the experience from a personal blogging standpoint. I wrote about it three time over (see my BlogHer12 posts on my personal blog). I loved it. I hated it. But I shall return next year for the [...]

Read the full article →

When You Sponsor a Conference: Top Five Tips for Brands

July 26, 2012

Nakeva Corothers via Compfight Last week, as I was jumping all over bloggers about their behavior in regards to conferences, brands, and swag, I linked to a post about what brands can expect after BlogHer. In fact, after I wrote that post last year, many of those brands visited my site and read the post. [...]

Read the full article →

Dear BlogHer Sponsors… They Don’t Speak For Me

July 17, 2012

This post is for brands and bloggers. For brands, it’s more of a caution and clarification about who bloggers really are. For bloggers, think “What Not to Wear” for blogging. We’ll call it, “What Not to Do.” Blog conference season is in full swing with the grandmommy of them all right around the corner. BlogHer [...]

Read the full article →

Digital Motherhood: The Power and Pitfalls of Social Media

May 29, 2012

I recently look an early morning trip to Philadelphia to support a one day bootcamp for pregnant teens and teen moms. My role was to speak on a relevant topic concerning social media. I have to admit that it’s been a while since I’ve been a teen and we certainly didn’t have social media waaaaaaay [...]

Read the full article →
Web Statistics